• Facebook
  • X
  • RSS
Molten Salt Reactors (incl Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor)
  • Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor
  • MSR Benefits (popup)
  • Molten Salt Reactors
    • What is a MSR or LFTR?
    • Molten Fuel, Cooled by Molten Salt
    • Can’t Melt Down? No High Pressure?
    • Not LWR, Unlike Other Nuclear Power
    • Heat for Industrial Use
    • Converts Thorium to Uranium
    • Solving Technical Challenges
    • Additional MSR Information
    • More About Thorium
    • Kindle version
  • Safety
    • Passive and Inherent Safety
    • No Water, no Loss of Coolant Accidents
    • No High Pressure to Contain
    • No Chance of Nuclear Meltdown
    • Can’t Melt Through
    • How Might LFTRs Fail?
    • Would Molten Salt Reactors Really Prevent Fukushima Disaster?
  • Nuclear Waste
    • No Long-Term Nuclear Waste Storage
    • What To Do With Nuclear Waste
    • What’s Better than Storing Nuclear Waste?
    • Solution to Nuclear Waste
    • Consume Nuclear Waste
    • Worthless for Nuclear Weapons
  • Economics of LFTR
    • Manufacturing LFTRs
    • Useful LFTR Fission By-Products
    • Downsides of LFTRs
  • Article Responses
Select Page

Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors have Passive and Inherent Safety

by George - WordPress Support & Marketing Coaching | Jan 17, 2012 | MSR, LFTR | 0 comments

Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors have Passive and Inherent Safety including coolant that won’t boil away, fuel that can be drained to cooling tanks, and running at atmospheric pressure

LFTRs Do Not Need High Pressure Containment

by George - WordPress Support & Marketing Coaching | Jan 17, 2012 | MSR, LFTR | 1 comment

Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors do not need High Pressure Containment, since there are no dangerous high pressures.

Popular Subjects

article response basalt CarbFix Chernobyl CO2 neutral electricity CO2 storage CO2-neutral gasoline desalinate water dirty bomb eliminate coal/oil eliminate nuclear waste fast-spectrum MSR fission byproducts Forbes fukushima Horse Butte Wind Farm Huffington Post Iran nuclear weapons James Conca lftr vs lwr liquid fluoride thorium reactor loss of coolant Lydia O'Conner materials testing molten salt reactor nuclear accidents nuclear meltdown nuclear reactor nuclear waste NuScale ocean acidification power grid pressure containment pressure explosions reactor construction reactor safety reduce CO2 Senator Feinstein small modular reactor solar power thorium Thorium Energy Alliance uranium-232 waste storage Weinberg Foundation

Climate Change Fascinating Science LWR MSR, LFTR Nuclear Waste Ocean Acidification Solar, Wind

MSR Benefits

Pop-Up MSR Benefits

Recent Comments

  • Takahiro Kishida on Thorium Converts to Uranium Inside the Reactor
  • George on How Might LFTRs Fail?
  • BMB on How Might LFTRs Fail?
  • Richard McIver on Reprocessing nuclear waste (from Light Water Reactors) with MSR
  • Paui F. Dietz on LFTRs Are Worthless for Making Nuclear Weapons
  • Alan Brown on Useful LFTR Fission By-Products
  • Richard McIver on Can Use LFTRs to Consume Nuclear Waste
  • Richard McIver on Nuclear Waste Cleanup is expensive, is there a better way than Storing it?
  • NAYAN DAVE on Thorium Converts to Uranium Inside the Reactor
  • Thomas F. Budinger on MSR – A Nuclear Reactor That Can’t Melt Down? No High-Pressure Coolant? Consumes Nuclear Waste? Yes!
  • Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor
  • molten salt reactor
  • lftr vs lwr
  • reactor safety
  • nuclear waste
  • climate change
  • lftr process heat
  • article responses
  • Facebook
  • X
  • RSS
Design by Lerner Consulting